[SURBL-Discuss] SURBL WS test scores in SA 3.0

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Sun Aug 29 06:23:46 CEST 2004


On Sunday, August 29, 2004, 4:33:15 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
>> > Also anyone not using zombies can be easily blocked with
>> > conventional RBLs at a vastly lower computational cost.

>> Dunno..... In the last few days I've seen trash coming from dialups which
>> weren't in any RBL. Only a fast entry in my local SURBL zone stopped the
>> flood from reaching more than a couple of users.
>> (1 minute update)

> Yes, i noticed the same, they start with fresh proxy's it seems for every 
> run. Or at least a couple of fresh ones... ;)

> So you also send in the ones you list locally towards SURBL ? If not mail 
> me in private so we can get those in also.

Please don't add your local block lists into WS.  Only add
entries that would be appropriate for the entire world to
use.

0.4% FPs or whatever WS is, really is not as useful as it
should be.  We need find ways to reduce the FPs, not increase
them. 

Jeff C.



More information about the Discuss mailing list