[SURBL-Discuss] SURBL WS test scores in SA 3.0
jeffc at surbl.org
Sun Aug 29 06:23:46 CEST 2004
On Sunday, August 29, 2004, 4:33:15 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
>> > Also anyone not using zombies can be easily blocked with
>> > conventional RBLs at a vastly lower computational cost.
>> Dunno..... In the last few days I've seen trash coming from dialups which
>> weren't in any RBL. Only a fast entry in my local SURBL zone stopped the
>> flood from reaching more than a couple of users.
>> (1 minute update)
> Yes, i noticed the same, they start with fresh proxy's it seems for every
> run. Or at least a couple of fresh ones... ;)
> So you also send in the ones you list locally towards SURBL ? If not mail
> me in private so we can get those in also.
Please don't add your local block lists into WS. Only add
entries that would be appropriate for the entire world to
0.4% FPs or whatever WS is, really is not as useful as it
should be. We need find ways to reduce the FPs, not increase
More information about the Discuss