[SURBL-Discuss] To MUNGE to not to MUNGE

[SM]

Hi David,
At 08:08 01-09-2004, David Hooton wrote:
>I disagree, this only takes into account the SA implementation of
>SURBL and does not take into account other peoples implementations
>which may still block on body text.

These implementations should be able to whitelist the server which hosts 
this mailing list.  If they are blocking on body text, it means that they 
would also be rejecting spam reports to abuse at example.com.

Regards,
-sm