[SURBL-Discuss] Whitelist all Bonded Senders?
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
amitchell at isipp.com
Fri Sep 10 05:01:22 CEST 2004
> anntaylor.outbound.ed10.com.iddb.isipp.com. 1H IN A 64.14.86.219
>
> 219.86.14.64.iadb.isipp.com. 1H IN A 127.0.100.7
> 219.86.14.64.iadb.isipp.com. 1H IN A 127.0.0.1
> 219.86.14.64.iadb.isipp.com. 1H IN A 127.0.0.2
> 219.86.14.64.iadb.isipp.com. 1H IN A 127.0.2.2
Or, alternatively, a lookup to IADB2 yields:
219.86.14.64.iadb2.isipp.com. 1H IN A 127.0.0.40
This means that they have accumulated 40 points in our IADB2 point
scoring system - this is the aggregate scoring offered as an
alternative to the individual data-point scoring you've quoted above.
The IADB2 scores are as follows:
Listed in IADB
-------------- next part --------------
*Default score
-------------- next part --------------
10
Vouched listing
*They are known to ISIPP as good senders
10
Participate in EDDB
*They have certain required policies and are immediately contactable
10
Is a member of EPIA
*They participate in a cross-industry sender/receiver forum
10
Publishes SPF or Microsoft Caller I.D.
*They take responsibility for domain authentication
10
Participates in Habeas or Bonded Sender
*They are contractually obligated to send only wanted email
20
All mailing list mail is opt-in
10
All mailing list mail is confirmed (double) opt-in
20
------
This is taken from: http://www.isipp.com/iadb2codes.php
As someone else noted, that means that in order to get a score of, say,
40 (127.0.0.40), one has to have 4 'hits', or be listed with Habeas or
Bonded Sender or have all mail be confirmed opt-in plus 2 other 'hits.
40 seems to be a good cut-off for deciding to whitelist something (40
or above) or not.
Anne
More information about the Discuss
mailing list