[SURBL-Discuss] Whitelist all Bonded Senders?

Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. amitchell at isipp.com
Fri Sep 10 05:01:22 CEST 2004


> anntaylor.outbound.ed10.com.iddb.isipp.com.  1H IN A  64.14.86.219
>
> 219.86.14.64.iadb.isipp.com.  1H IN A  127.0.100.7
> 219.86.14.64.iadb.isipp.com.  1H IN A  127.0.0.1
> 219.86.14.64.iadb.isipp.com.  1H IN A  127.0.0.2
> 219.86.14.64.iadb.isipp.com.  1H IN A  127.0.2.2

Or, alternatively,  a lookup to IADB2 yields:

219.86.14.64.iadb2.isipp.com.  1H IN A  127.0.0.40

This means that they have accumulated 40 points in our IADB2 point 
scoring system - this is the aggregate scoring offered as an 
alternative to the individual data-point scoring you've quoted above.

The IADB2 scores are as follows:

Listed in IADB
-------------- next part --------------

*Default score
-------------- next part --------------

10

Vouched listing
*They are known to ISIPP as good senders
10

Participate in EDDB
*They have certain required policies and are immediately  contactable
10

Is a member of EPIA
*They participate in a cross-industry sender/receiver forum
10

Publishes SPF or Microsoft Caller I.D.
*They take responsibility for domain  authentication
10

Participates in Habeas or Bonded Sender
*They are contractually  obligated to send only wanted email
20

All mailing list mail is opt-in
10

All mailing list mail is confirmed (double) opt-in
20

------

This is taken from:  http://www.isipp.com/iadb2codes.php

As someone else noted, that means that in order to get a score of, say, 
40 (127.0.0.40), one has to have 4 'hits', or be listed with Habeas or 
Bonded Sender or have all mail be confirmed opt-in plus 2 other 'hits.

40 seems to be a good cut-off for deciding to whitelist something (40 
or above) or not.

Anne




More information about the Discuss mailing list