[SURBL-Discuss] Additional phish/fraud list

[Jeff Chan]

On Friday, September 17, 2004, 7:43:19 PM, David Hooton wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:00:45 -0700, Jeff Chan <jeffc at surbl.org> wrote:
>> How about getting me rsync access to we can merge these in with
>> the existing PH list.  I'm sending you a public key privately.
>> 
>> How do you feel about the quality of the data.
>> 
>> David Hooton are you familiar with this effort?  Got any
>> feedback?  :-)

> I think it would be great to have the additional data merged into PH
> if we can.  I'm running some tests on the data over the weekend but so
> far can't see any reason why the 2 shouldn't be merged.

> Collecting phishing data is something that requires the biggest
> possible catchment area, the more the merrier as far as I'm concerned
> - it's also very hard to mistake what a phishing email is so
> additional FP's really aren't much of an issue.

Thanks for your feedback, David!

I agree FPs shouldn't happen too often with Phishes.

Is there much overlap between the MailSecurity and MailPolice
phishing data?

Jeff C.