[SURBL-Discuss] Additional phish/fraud list

[Jeff Chan]

On Saturday, September 18, 2004, 5:14:24 PM, Jay Swackhamer wrote:
> On Saturday, September 18, 2004 5:38 AM, David Hooton wrote:
>> > Also Jay:  example.tld is on the list.  That doesn't resolve and
>> > probably isn't useful for fraud or phishing so you may want to
>> > consider removing it.  ;-)
>> >
>> > It would be nice to figure out these issues before adding the
>> > mailpolice fraud data into PH.
>>
>> Agreed on all counts.

> Yes, example.tld was always in there for testing purposes. It's a
> never-used domain name, so it's safe for inclusion, and good for
> verification, IMHO. Same could be said for example.com.

Fair enough.  We added our own testpoints, but chose different
ones.

  http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#testpoints

We whitelist example.tld, example.com, etc. to keep them off
our lists anyway.

  http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/whitelists/placeholder-domains.sort

Jeff C.