[SPAM-TAG] [SURBL-Discuss] Spammer threatening to suesingle4y ou.net

[Jeff Chan]

On Monday, September 27, 2004, 6:12:41 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> In another message about doubleclick you came to the conclusion
> to whitelist this stuff.  IMHO that's a bad idea.  There's no
> reason to whitelist somebody known for utter dubious business
> practices:  as long as they don't spam they won't show up in a
> SURBL, why waste your time or bandwidth for these [censored] ?

Doubleclick domains show up in a lot of hams.  Do we want to
block those hams?

Yes or no?

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."