[SURBL-Discuss] Re: SURBL: sc2 vs sc?

Chris cpollock at earthlink.net
Thu Aug 4 02:45:50 CEST 2005

On Wednesday 03 August 2005 04:08 pm, Jeff Chan wrote:

> Does anyone else have any results for SC2 to share?  It seems to
> hit about 10-15% more spam for different folks, but is it any
> better or worse on hitting ham (false positives)?
> Jeff C.
> --

Jeff, from 03:59, 29 Jul to 03:59 3 Aug, I've gotten 901 total messages, 219 
being ham which neither sc2 nor xs has hit on.  On spam sc2 is between #7 and 
#10 on spam hits according to the stat script I run. SC only shows up on 
about 3 of the 6 days.  I've extended the hit list to the top 50 which may 
give better stats.


Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
19:38:12 up 4:14, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 0.86, 0.79
Mandriva Linux 10.1 Official, kernel
A meeting's length will be directly proportional to the boredom the speaker 
	-- Murphy's Laws of Teaching n°5

More information about the Discuss mailing list