[SURBL-Discuss] Re: SURBL: sc2 vs sc?

Chris chris at iloaf.com
Wed Aug 3 20:17:43 CEST 2005


Jeff Chan wrote:

>On Monday, August 1, 2005, 11:37:19 PM, Daniel Kleinsinger wrote:
>  
>
>>Jeff Chan wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>It's sounding like the sc2 list is catching 10-15% more spam than
>>>the sc list, based on some early reports of SA users.  Is anyone
>>>else getting some results?
>>>
>>>Are there differences in ham hits?
>>>
>>>How about xs.surbl.org?
>>>      
>>>
>>Since 7/27 config change to add sc2 my server has tagged 27,609 messages 
>>as spam:
>>URIBL_SC2_SURBL has hit on 15,981 messages, all of which were tagged spam
>>URIBL_SC_SURBL has hit on 14,105 messages, all of which were tagged spam
>>URIBL_XS_SURBL has hit on 13,165 messages, 3 of which were not tagged 
>>spam; however, all 3 look like a fn or damaged virus.
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>So SC2 catches about 13% more messages for me.  In the week prior to 
>>7/25 (when you told me the XS config changed) XS hit on average 1570 
>>messages per day.  Since then it has averaged 2,175 messages per day.
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks for the feedback Daniel.  Sounds like SC2 may be worth
>making into production SC.  But I'd still like to hear back from
>some of the SA corpus testers about ham hit rates.
>
>Jeff C.
>
Jeff, Have you got some details on the differences you can share with us?

C.


More information about the Discuss mailing list