From schampeo@hesketh.com Thu Jul 8 21:27:15 2004 From: Steven Champeon To: discuss@lists.surbl.org Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Submissions to SURBL list thru SARE website. Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:26:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20040708192634.GE27275@hesketh.com> In-Reply-To: <620A4FF9B83DD511B69900062939D037ABFD0B@internal.merchantsoverseas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6661282759895844043==" --===============6661282759895844043== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable on Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:17:52PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: > Good grief. Let me say this slowly.... >=20 > SURBL is for domains in LINKS, URLS, websites, images, things you click on, > images hosted in the email. >=20 > SURBL is NOT, will never be used, doesn't care, /dev/null's, any domain or > IP the email came from.=20 Well, I for one won't be sending any more domains along if I have to also distinguish between the domains I happened to find in email bodies from those I happened to find in message headers. Sorry. The overlap is far too great, as for example in a recent message I got (summarized): Received: from mx51.AfClawFrog1.us (mx51.afclawfrog1.us [216.162.182.51]) Subject: [Target-removed] Free Break-In & Fire Protection System Message-ID: [text part with a snippet of fictional text] [html part containing several links to=20