From jeffc@surbl.org Fri Mar  4 22:05:11 2005
From: Jeff Chan <jeffc@surbl.org>
To: discuss@lists.surbl.org
Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: SP91011 your recent report to eBay's Trust
	and Safety Department (KMM157050156V37604L0KM)
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 13:09:53 -0800
Message-ID: <193249229.20050304130953@surbl.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503042143001.29343@mailbox.prolocation.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3997944115077633312=="

--===============3997944115077633312==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Friday, March 4, 2005, 12:43:34 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Hi!

>>>> Perhaps Cnet could also close theirs, we have seen a load of com.com crap
>>>> redirects the last days.

>>> Hmm, can you post some (munged or URI) examples and let us all
>>> contact them about it?

>> got LOTS like these to give away.
>>
>> <a href=3Dhttp://dw.com.
>> com/redir?tag=3Dbesides_away&destUrl=3Dzmop%2e%67%6fw%65s%74%61%6ed%67e%74=
6%39%2e%63%6f%6D
>> target=3D_blank><font size=3D5 color=3D1C1CFF><u><b>0rdeer meds at Discouu=
nt
>> here changed</font></b></u></a>

> And their abuse doesnt even respond, so perhaps someone with clue is=20
> reading along ;)

Please post some example and we'll try to reach cnet.

Cheers,

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."


--===============3997944115077633312==--