From nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de Sun Jan 23 06:06:08 2005 From: Frank Ellermann To: discuss@lists.surbl.org Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] Submission Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 06:05:05 +0100 Message-ID: <41F33081.51F4@xyzzy.claranet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5679743348791675375==" --===============5679743348791675375== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, something I saw in a SpamCop discussion: | I don't know of any other method of feeding spamvertised urls to any of | the subsections of surbl described here http://www.surbl.org/lists.html Apparently that FAQ isn't answered in the FAQ (?). Therefore I tried to find an answer, but that ended with a "403 forbidden" causing a "404 not found" for the URL So what is the answer for this FAQ ? Bye, Frank --===============5679743348791675375==-- From jeffc@surbl.org Sun Jan 23 10:35:44 2005 From: Jeff Chan To: discuss@lists.surbl.org Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Submission Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:38:11 -0800 Message-ID: <736931776.20050123013811@surbl.org> In-Reply-To: <41F33081.51F4@xyzzy.claranet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4267202852267033846==" --===============4267202852267033846== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday, January 22, 2005, 9:05:05 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote: > Hi, something I saw in a SpamCop discussion: > > > | I don't know of any other method of feeding spamvertised urls to any of > | the subsections of surbl described here http://www.surbl.org/lists.html > Apparently that FAQ isn't answered in the FAQ (?). Therefore I > tried to find an answer, but that ended with a "403 forbidden" > causing a "404 not found" for the URL > Yes, the submission form seems down right now: > > > 403 Forbidden > >

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/ > on this server.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found > error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the re= quest.

Apache/2.0.40 Server at www.rulesemporium.com Port 80

> Not sure why. Maybe the SARE ninjas can check it? > So what is the answer for this FAQ ? Bye, Frank Well the answer is in the lists document: different data sources have different inputs. SC and AB use SpamCop reports as input. JP and OB use private traps as input. WS is a manual list. That said, I've updated the Lists document slightly to reflect this and added a FAQ entry also. http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#reporting Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it." --===============4267202852267033846==-- From nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de Sun Jan 23 13:48:39 2005 From: Frank Ellermann To: discuss@lists.surbl.org Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Submission Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:47:28 +0100 Message-ID: <41F39CE0.59F8@xyzzy.claranet.de> In-Reply-To: <736931776.20050123013811@surbl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6798510402921782486==" --===============6798510402921782486== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jeff Chan wrote: > SC and AB use SpamCop reports as input. Okay, nothing to do here for SC users, normal spam reports with SpamCop are good enough. > JP and OB use private traps as input. Also clear, stuff found by Joe etc. or by outblaze. > WS is a manual list. That's what I tested (resulting in a 403 + 404 ;-) > That said, I've updated the Lists document slightly > to reflect this and added a FAQ entry also. > http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#reporting Thanks. I've posted a pointer to this thread in the SpamCop newsgroup. The most interesting SURBL for SC reporters is probably PH, if they send their reports to one of the PH addresses mentioned in your article Bye, Frank --===============6798510402921782486==--