From jeffc@surbl.org Tue May 10 07:34:11 2005
From: Jeff Chan <jeffc@surbl.org>
To: discuss@lists.surbl.org
Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] Feedback on adprofile.net wanted
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 22:34:13 -0700
Message-ID: <357174725.20050509223413@surbl.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1284596356077052821=="

--===============1284596356077052821==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

adprofile.net reportedly appeared in a flowers.com ham as:

<td align=3D"middle"><a href=3D"http://tx.adprofile.net/tx/r?CID=3D12&M=3D3&s=
id=3D800ABC123"><IMG height=3D90
src=3D"http://a1234.g.akamai.net/f/1233/1234/1a/www.1800flowers.com/800f_asse=
ts/images/flowers/images/banners/swift me
too120X90.gif" width=3D"120" NOSEND=3D"1" border=3D"0"></a></td>

Yet it's listed on WS by Bill Stearns.   This may be a false
positive.  Does anyone have any more information about it?

Catherine Hampton says it's not on her spam radar and others
have said that they may be web spammers on guestbooks, wikis,
etc. but not email spammers.  They seem to have some minor
NANAS.

Feedback wanted.  :-)

Jeff C.
--
Don't harm innocent bystanders.


--===============1284596356077052821==--