From csanterre@MerchantsOverseas.com Thu Dec  2 23:47:15 2004
From: Chris Santerre <csanterre@MerchantsOverseas.com>
To: discuss@lists.surbl.org
Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Discuss: WAS:  SURBL+ Checker Submission
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:51:00 -0500
Message-ID:
 <620A4FF9B83DD511B69900062939D037E0F1EE@internal.merchantsoverseas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0076300064735998644=="

--===============0076300064735998644==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



>-----Original Message-----
>From: David B Funk [mailto:dbfunk(a)engineering.uiowa.edu]
>Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:10 PM
>To: SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Discuss: WAS: SURBL+ Checker Submission
>
>
>On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>> I stripped the header for this discussion. Is this a spam 
>domain or an
>> attempt to poison SURBL. It is obviously a spam, but is domain bogus?
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> *SNIP*
>>
>[snip..]
>> >href=3D"http://hesatosser.com.info/?wid=3D100005">H=
>> >ERE</a><br><br>
>[snip..]
>> ><a href=3D"http://hesatosser.com.info/?wid=3D100005">
>> >Get it now
>[snip..]
>> > href=3D"http://http://hesatosser.com.com/nomore.html">Go
>> >here</a> to stop=
>
>Neither, it's broken spam-ware. The actual pill-spam-site
>is "hesatosser .com" (which is listed in SURBL ;).
>
>"*.com.com" is a valid domain name, belongs to CNet, clearly
>not spam. "*.com.info" isn't even a valid domain at all.
>

Thanks dave, that is what I thought. Helped to hear it from someone else :) 

--Chris

--===============0076300064735998644==--