From nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de Mon Jul 26 09:01:07 2004
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
To: discuss@lists.surbl.org
Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: Jeff's whitelists
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:00:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4104ABF1.F96@xyzzy.claranet.de>
In-Reply-To: <1623959278.20040719230358@supranet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9122110887453938966=="

--===============9122110887453938966==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jeff Chan wrote:
=20
> I would contend abuse of spamarrest's services, as you
> originally described them, is closer to a Joe Job than
> outright spam by spamarrest.

IBTD.  And if you read some of the 166 messages shown by...

<http://www.google.com/groups?q=3Dspamarrest.com+group%3A*.net-abuse.*+-group=
%3A*.sightings>

...you'll find that I'm not exactly alone with this opinion.

 [co.to vs. oo.to]
> the site is oo.to, not co.to

Sorry.  <http://oo.cx/domains/home.php> claims that this is a
"iRedirector (subdomain edition)" in it's <title>, and I get
the same page at <http://oo.to/domains/home.php>, dito nn.to,
dito uu.to

I found no abuse report links, but testing some of the domains
mentioned in nanas they _might_ do something about abuse (or
my old browser simply can't handle their weird JavaScripts (?)). =20

                            Bye, Frank


--===============9122110887453938966==--