From jeffc@surbl.org Sun Jan 23 10:35:44 2005 From: Jeff Chan To: discuss@lists.surbl.org Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Submission Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:38:11 -0800 Message-ID: <736931776.20050123013811@surbl.org> In-Reply-To: <41F33081.51F4@xyzzy.claranet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7138696143399153155==" --===============7138696143399153155== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday, January 22, 2005, 9:05:05 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote: > Hi, something I saw in a SpamCop discussion: > > > | I don't know of any other method of feeding spamvertised urls to any of > | the subsections of surbl described here http://www.surbl.org/lists.html > Apparently that FAQ isn't answered in the FAQ (?). Therefore I > tried to find an answer, but that ended with a "403 forbidden" > causing a "404 not found" for the URL > Yes, the submission form seems down right now: > > > 403 Forbidden > >

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/ > on this server.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found > error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the re= quest.

Apache/2.0.40 Server at www.rulesemporium.com Port 80

> Not sure why. Maybe the SARE ninjas can check it? > So what is the answer for this FAQ ? Bye, Frank Well the answer is in the lists document: different data sources have different inputs. SC and AB use SpamCop reports as input. JP and OB use private traps as input. WS is a manual list. That said, I've updated the Lists document slightly to reflect this and added a FAQ entry also. http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#reporting Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it." --===============7138696143399153155==--