From jeffc@surbl.org Sun Sep 26 00:46:49 2004
From: Jeff Chan <jeffc@surbl.org>
To: discuss@lists.surbl.org
Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] RFC: SURBL inclusion policy
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:46:30 -0700
Message-ID: <49683680.20040925154630@supranet.net>
In-Reply-To: <415555FE.1732@xyzzy.claranet.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4381963613958645514=="

--===============4381963613958645514==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Saturday, September 25, 2004, 4:26:54 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
 
>> Please let me/us know what you think of it now.

> 13: ... </em</strong>

> That should be </em></strong>, I got the whole page as <em> ;-)

> 69 - 75:
> | <a href="http://www.isipp.com/iadbcodes.php">iadb.isipp.com
> | or iadb2.isipp.com and wadb.isipp.com</a>.
> [...]

> <a href="http://www.isipp.com/iadbcodes.php">iadb.isipp.com</a> or
> <a href="http://www.isipp.com/iadb2codes.php">iadb2.isipp.com</a>.

> Don't mention WADB here, remove the explanation, it's only
> confusing (the linked ISIPP page does it, you don't need it).
> Or do you know any interesting WADB entries at the moment ?

> 155: wierd news

Fixed.  Thanks!

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."


--===============4381963613958645514==--