sa->sb? (Was: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: Please sanity check
jeffc at surbl.org
Sun Apr 11 02:29:09 CEST 2004
On Sunday, April 11, 2004, 12:59:57 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Sunday, April 11, 2004, 12:29:43 AM, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
>> I have a concern about the rule. Bill Stern's SpamAssassin blacklist is
>> a blacklist *for* SpamAssassin, so I think the naming of your rule and
>> the DNSBL name (sa.surbl.org) are unintentionally a bit misleading since
>> the list is not maintained by the ASF or SpamAssassin. I think it would
>> be a good idea to rename the DNSBL and the rule to make this clearer.
>> Maybe we should encourage (or help) Bill Stern to pick a snappy name.
> Fair enough. I picked sa.surbl.org out of thin air since his rule
> started with "sa" and to give oblique credit to the original
> motivation for his rule, if not the precise source.
> Bill, anyone, got some better names? I prefer two letters.
> (sa and sc were kind of confusing anyway.) "sb" for
> Sa-Blacklist anyone? LOL! ;-)
BTW, Daniel is pretty influential among SA developers.
If he suggests changing the name, we should probably change
it. Right now I'm leaning towards sb, but am open to other
mailto:jeffc at surbl.org
More information about the Discuss