[SURBL-Discuss] First attempt to subvert surbl approach ? :)

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Wed Apr 21 18:59:17 CEST 2004

On Wednesday, April 21, 2004, 5:38:06 PM, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 12:30 22/04/2004, you wrote:

>>Just browsing through my spam folder and noticed a spam with the following 

> [URL snipped]

>>(without the -munged of course)

> Well that blew up in my face. My own SpamAssassin running SpamCopURI-0.12 
> (and the redirect parser enabled) picked that URL up despite my attempt to 
> mung it, and matched it against both sc and ws :) Fortunately BAYES_00 was 
> enough to prevent it from actually being blocked, but possibly some of you 
> out there may have blocked it...

> I can see one disadvantage to surbl - it makes it pretty hard to discuss 
> the domain names of spammers ;)

LOL!  Munge harder...  ;-)

Jeff C.

More information about the Discuss mailing list