[SURBL-Discuss] And away we go!
csanterre at merchantsoverseas.com
Thu Apr 22 13:06:12 CEST 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doc Schneider [mailto:maddoc at maddoc.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 11:51 AM
> To: SURBL Discussion list
> Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] And away we go!
> Chris Santerre wrote:
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: David Coulson [mailto:david at davidcoulson.net]
> >>Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:38 AM
> >>To: SURBL Discussion list
> >>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] And away we go!
> >>SpamCopURI stats for one domain here for this morning.
> >>Total: 33024
> >>SC 22090
> >>WS 19029
> >>BE 3597
> >>On a similar note, Spamhaus' XBL got hit 23847 times which
> is pretty
> > And BE will ALWAYS be lower...Why? I use RBLs at the MTA level :)
> > I knew it would effect my file, but I couldn't let the
> company take a hit
> > for BigEvil sake.
> I left bigevil.cf in my spamassassin directory and added the RBL for
> be.surbl.org and both are catching things!!
> Maybe a suggestion. Might want to make a limited bigevil
> which just does
> the variable domains. And then folks can use it along with
> the RBL be.
> Did that make sense?
You took the thoughts right out of my noggin!
> Damn I either need a new unix sleep command or more coffee! 8*))
I have a thermos by my monitor at all times. A pot takes to long to brew. A
thermos is instant ;)
> I'll run some stats from my test here in a bit and we shall
> see what is
> Chris as always you are a "big nerd" HAR!
Oh yeah! Straight C student! And I went to school for none of this stuff.
> -Doc (Who has been a nerd for almost half a century!)
Ouch! You should take a nap after reading this ;)
More information about the Discuss