[SURBL-Discuss] packaging SpamCopURI
ekolve at comcast.net
Thu Apr 22 10:38:17 CEST 2004
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:09:34PM +0100, Robert Brooks wrote:
> Eric Kolve wrote:
> >>I assume that these normally replace the originally install SpamAssassin
> >>files. Is this correct, and if so should I look at adding SpamCopURI to
> >>my SpamAssassin package.
> >SpamCopURI is intended to overwrite these files. You can package these
> >with SpamAssassin, but just be sure that its only version 2.63.
> is there a reason why SpamCopURI isn't a patch to SpamAssassin?
I could have made a patch instead of just overwriting, but I thought
it would be easier to install if I didn't patch since
users would then have to locate the .pm files and directly patch
> Robert Brooks, Network Manager, Hyperlink Interactive Ltd
> <robb at hyperlink-interactive.co.uk> http://hyperlink-interactive.co.uk/
> Tel: +44 (0)20 7240 8121 Fax: +44 (0)20 7240 8098
> - Help Microsoft stamp out piracy. Give Linux to a friend today! -
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.surbl.org
More information about the Discuss