[SURBL-Discuss] packaging SpamCopURI

[Robert Brooks]

Eric Kolve wrote:
> I could have made a patch instead of just overwriting, but I thought
> it would be easier to install if I didn't patch since
> users would then have to locate the .pm files and directly patch
> them.

yes, hardly ideal, perhaps a patch in the tarball as an alternative method.  Is 
there any chance the common code will get accepted into 2.64?

Regards,

Rob

-- 
Robert Brooks,         Network Manager,      Hyperlink Interactive Ltd
<robb at hyperlink-interactive.co.uk> http://hyperlink-interactive.co.uk/
Tel: +44 (0)20 7240 8121                      Fax: +44 (0)20 7240 8098
-  Help Microsoft stamp out piracy.  Give Linux to a friend today!   -