[SURBL-Discuss] packaging SpamCopURI
Robert Brooks
robb at hyperlink-interactive.co.uk
Fri Apr 23 10:40:01 CEST 2004
Eric Kolve wrote:
> I could have made a patch instead of just overwriting, but I thought
> it would be easier to install if I didn't patch since
> users would then have to locate the .pm files and directly patch
> them.
yes, hardly ideal, perhaps a patch in the tarball as an alternative method. Is
there any chance the common code will get accepted into 2.64?
Regards,
Rob
--
Robert Brooks, Network Manager, Hyperlink Interactive Ltd
<robb at hyperlink-interactive.co.uk> http://hyperlink-interactive.co.uk/
Tel: +44 (0)20 7240 8121 Fax: +44 (0)20 7240 8098
- Help Microsoft stamp out piracy. Give Linux to a friend today! -
More information about the Discuss
mailing list