[SURBL-Discuss] packaging SpamCopURI
robb at hyperlink-interactive.co.uk
Fri Apr 23 16:05:02 CEST 2004
Eric Kolve wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:40:01AM +0100, Robert Brooks wrote:
>>Eric Kolve wrote:
>>>I could have made a patch instead of just overwriting, but I thought
>>>it would be easier to install if I didn't patch since
>>>users would then have to locate the .pm files and directly patch
>>yes, hardly ideal, perhaps a patch in the tarball as an alternative method.
>>Is there any chance the common code will get accepted into 2.64?
> I am working on a more intelligent Makefile.PL that attempts to
> determine where you have installed SA and install over it.
hmmm, I guess I can do it myself, but what I'd like to do is add a patch for the
common files to the SpamAssassin rpm and then make a separate rpm with
SpamCopURI.pm etc in.
> Its not likely this will get incorporated into 2.64.
yes, I see SA3.0 is not too far away.
Robert Brooks, Network Manager, Hyperlink Interactive Ltd
<robb at hyperlink-interactive.co.uk> http://hyperlink-interactive.co.uk/
Tel: +44 (0)20 7240 8121 Fax: +44 (0)20 7240 8098
- Help Microsoft stamp out piracy. Give Linux to a friend today! -
More information about the Discuss