[SURBL-Discuss] This ROCKS!
jm at jmason.org
Fri Apr 30 11:09:48 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Doc Schneider writes:
>I am on my days off and hope to get some type of stats gathering ditty
>going. But not sure what stats folks want to see. I had some
>conversations with Chris "The Big Evil One" and he had some ideas.
>Am just not sure what direction to pursue.
>I did join the dev list for SA and sort of got talked into checking the
>docs for SA 3.0 which I'm slowly working on. Just checking them for
>proper API coverage in the different modules it is using.
>So my question to you folks is what sort of statistics would you like to
>see? Number of rules hit, even if a ham (I always get hungry when
>talking about ham and spam but I digress) or just total number and the
>actual rules that are being hit for all spam? And isn't there something
>already in SA that does these rules and hits? corporra(sic and too lazy
Hi Doc -- cc'ing sa-dev, since it's really an SpamAssassin thing
rather than a SURBL thing ;)
I'm not sure if you mean measuring rule accuracy in advance to pick good
scores, or reporting stats after the fact for sysadmins.
For the first one, read:
For the second:
We recently added some additional stats output to spamd in SpamAssassin
3.0.0. This should improve the accessibility of info about rules
being used during scanning for tools to summarise.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Discuss