[SURBL-Discuss] PH list question

[Bill Landry]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Hooton" <david.hooton at gmail.com>


> Hi Bill,
>
> One of the problems with Phishing is that the blocking is very much
> reactive and the message flows tend to be much smaller than spamming
> runs.  The other complication is that phishers seem to use trojaned
> PC's or hacked servers to host content, so the content is almost
> always different.
>
> We add to the list as soon as our spamtraps see one, however end user
> submissions are also very much encouraged - if you get anything which
> slips through, please forward it to postmaster at
> corp.mailsecurity.net.au
>
> > I get lots of hits on all of the other test.  Can someone post a munged
URI
> > that should hit on the PH list so I can test with it.
>
> The PH list is still quite small and our data feeds are still growing,
> please feel free to become one of them!!

Thanks David, I will absolutely do that.  Too bad I didn't check this list
sooner, I already reported a couple of them to the Sniffer folks earlier
today and then deleted them (yes, from my sent items, as well).

Bill