[SURBL-Discuss] RFC: Public false positve reporting form

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Mon Aug 30 05:33:13 CEST 2004


How does anyone feel about a public false positive reporting
form?  Such a form would include the reporting party, the
domain(s) or IPs, reasons why it's a false positive, etc.

It could be processed publically or privately in a bug
tracking system.  It would be hand checked by some of our
experienced spam fighters.  The results could be published
or simply aggregated without public announcement into the
overall whitelist.

Is this a good or bad idea?

What level of publication should there be?

What forms of proof (if any) does anyone like?

Other comments?

Jeff C.



More information about the Discuss mailing list