[SURBL-Discuss] Spammers Workaround

[Jeff Chan]

On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 8:07:30 PM, SM SM wrote:
> Hi RD,
> At 17:37 02-12-2004, RD wrote:
>>Somehow spammers are using below's method to get around SURBL. I can 
>>create a simple body rule but might end-up having a huge list like the 
>>bigevil list. Any suggestions how to beat this type of spam?

> I copied and pasted the address in my browser and it does not 
> work.  Instead of beating this type of spam, we should encourage the use of 
> such urls in spam. :)

Yeah, if we're causing spammers to use broken URIs or broken
web names, then that's probably a good thing.

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."