[SURBL-Discuss] UGH.. More false positives

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Wed Dec 8 10:57:22 CET 2004


On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 1:33:18 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
>> To be honest it was anything on our whitelists that were
>> also on sc or any other lists.  It started from about 02:30
>> pacific time until I fixed it around 05:30.  Here are logs
>> for yahoo and hotmail:
>>
>> top-sites-domains.new.log:2004-12-07 10:28 yahoo.com
>> top-sites-domains.new.log:2004-12-07 13:22 yahoo.com
>> top-sites-domains.new.log:2004-12-07 10:28 hotmail.com
>> top-sites-domains.new.log:2004-12-07 13:22 hotmail.com

> To be clear, this affected the -global- whitelist. Most of the sublists 
> also have seperate whitelists, those were not effected, so a lot was 
> filtered on the submission end anyway.

Correct.  The only whitelist we don't really have
visibility on is whether SpamCop puts an internal
one on the spamvertised site domains that go into
SC.  So in a sense there are multiple safety devices.
Other data sources like ws, jp, ob, etc. have their
own whitelists.

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list