[SURBL-Discuss] RE: Feature Request: Whitelist_DNSRBL

[Jeff Chan]

On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 9:33:46 AM, Alex Broens wrote:
> Chris Santerre wrote:
>> Well we have talked about it and .... didn't come up with a solid answer.
>> The idea would cause more lookups and time for those who don't cache dns. We
>> do have a whitelist that our private research tools do poll. The idea is
>> that if it isn't in SURBL then it is white. 
>> 
>> This also puts more work to the already overworked contributors. ;)

> want to put me on the round robin list again?

Alex is referring to SURBL public name service delegations.
Yes, I can add your name server back if it can take 200k
bits per second of traffic.

Let me know if that's ok.

I think Chris and Dallas were referring to something else.

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."