[SURBL-Discuss] uptilt.com and their customers probably not s pammers

Chris Santerre csanterre at merchantsoverseas.com
Thu Jul 1 10:51:32 CEST 2004

-1 here

I think private is better. Public reports of FPs I am +1.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc at surbl.org]
>Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:51 AM
>To: SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] uptilt.com and their customers 
>probably not
>On Thursday, July 1, 2004, 4:40:54 AM, David Hooton wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 02:33:33 -0700, Jeff Chan <jeffc at surbl.org> wrote:
>>> the relative lack of inclusion across multiple SURBL
>>> data sources leads me to think that uptilt.com is probably
>>> not a spamhaus.  Therefore I've used that list of uptilt.com
>>> domains and customer domains as a whitelist.  That means they
>>> will not be included in SURBLs.
>> Thanks for your super diligence, we all appreciate it, so do 
>our clients :)
>Thanks for your kind words David.  As you can see I like to avoid
>false positives.  :-)
>I'm strongly tempted to make a public form for submitting
>whitelist entries, fully logged, rate-limited and reviewed,
>of course.  It could help with the FPs and add more public
>visibility to the whitelisting process.
>Jeff C.
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at lists.surbl.org

More information about the Discuss mailing list