[SURBL-Discuss] uptilt.com and their customers probably not s pammers

Chris Santerre csanterre at merchantsoverseas.com
Thu Jul 1 16:55:25 CEST 2004

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc at surbl.org]
>Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 3:39 PM
>To: 'SURBL Discussion list'
>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] uptilt.com and their customers 
>probably not
>s pammers
>On Thursday, July 1, 2004, 6:51:32 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> -1 here
>> I think private is better. Public reports of FPs I am +1.
>OK To me FPs and whitelisting are the same thing, but it
>sounds like if we did this you're saying it should be called
>"FP reporting" and not "whitelist reporting".  Am I interpreting
>what you're saying correctly?

Yup. (I can be confusing sometimes.) Saying "Tell us who should be
whitelisted." vs. "Did someone get marked incorrectly?" are different, yet
the outcome is the same....sort of.

If we never listed ebay, then no one will ever report ebay as an fp. 

CON: No proactive submissions. We may miss a popular domain.
PRO: We don't get tons of whitelist submissions. Taking all our time
checking them to see if they are legit instead of checking domains the
should be added.


More information about the Discuss mailing list