[SURBL-Discuss] Re: New SURBL additions

[Don Newcomer]

Here are my counts since 6:50 PM yesterday for all URI_RBL rules sorted by
spam and ham:

URI_RBL spam counts:

 3577 - AB_URI_RBL (5.0) - surbl.cf
 2499 - DS_URI_RBL (0.33) - surbl.cf
 7282 - OB_URI_RBL (4.0) - surbl.cf
 4279 - SPAMCOP_URI_RBL (3.0) - surbl.cf
 5458 - WS_URI_RBL (3.0) - surbl.cf

URI_RBL ham counts:

  231 - DS_URI_RBL (0.33) - surbl.cf
   18 - OB_URI_RBL (4.0) - surbl.cf
    1 - SPAMCOP_URI_RBL (3.0) - surbl.cf
   29 - WS_URI_RBL (3.0) - surbl.cf

Interesting that AB_URI_RBL has no false positives yet...  Still, we
haven't released spam filtering to our users yet so my Bayes training is
based pretty much on all of the SA rulesets' interpretation of spam (which
isn't necessarily a bad thing).

Don Newcomer
Senior Manager, Systems
Infrastructure Systems Department
Library and Information Services
Dickinson College
P.O. Box 1773
Carlisle, PA  17013
717-245-1256 (Voice)
717-245-1690 (FAX)
newcomer at dickinson.edu

On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Jeff Chan wrote:

> Still looking for anyone's spam detection rates and false
> positive rates with all the lists:
>
>   sc.surbl.org - SpamCop spamvertised sites
>   ws.surbl.org - sa-blacklist, BigEvil and other data
>   ob.surbl.org - OutBlaze spamvertised sites
>   ab.surbl.org - AbuseButler spamvertised sites
>
>   ds.surbl.org (beta, 6dos data)
>
> Jeff C.
> --
> Jeff Chan
> mailto:jeffc at surbl.org
> http://www.surbl.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.surbl.org
> http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>