[SURBL-Discuss] Timestamps (Was: Re: domain
overhand1383biz-MUNGED.us)
Jeff Chan
jeffc at surbl.org
Thu Jul 15 00:38:31 CEST 2004
On Sunday, July 11, 2004, 7:08:10 AM, Patrik Nilsson wrote:
> At 10:09 2004-07-08 -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
>>As it didn't hit any SURBL list, I promptly checked it in
>>http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi in order to submit it for
>>ws.surbl.org... Much to my surprise, it said it is already listed in
>>ws.surbl.org as well as in ob.surbl.org...
>><...>
>>maybe they were added between 1:00 AM and 9:00 AM?
>>It'd be nice to have a kind of timestamp in entries (at least when checking
>>them via web).
> I agree.
> As it is now, except for AB, it's impossible to find out if the reason that
> a spam with a currently listed domain got through during recent hours was
> due to detection problems or just that it's a very recent listing.
> Either having an "Added:" timestamp in the TXT data, or a web page where
> you can look up an ip and get information on when and why it was added,
> like many RBLs have, would be a great addition.
> Even a basic recent additions history page like the one AB has at
> http://spamvertised.abusebutler.com/ would help a lot.
> Thanks,
> Patrik
It may be of interest that there is a timestamped log of sc
blocklist additions at:
http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/top-sites-domains.new.log
and a much shorter log of sc whitelist hits at:
http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/whitelist-hits.new.log
Jeff C.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list