[SURBL-Discuss] Timestamps (Was: Re: domain overhand1383biz-MUNGED.us)

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Thu Jul 15 00:38:31 CEST 2004


On Sunday, July 11, 2004, 7:08:10 AM, Patrik Nilsson wrote:
> At 10:09 2004-07-08 -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
>>As it didn't hit any SURBL list, I promptly checked it in
>>http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi in order to submit it for
>>ws.surbl.org... Much to my surprise, it said it is already listed in
>>ws.surbl.org as well as in ob.surbl.org...
>><...>
>>maybe they were added between 1:00 AM and 9:00 AM?
>>It'd be nice to have a kind of timestamp in entries (at least when checking
>>them via web).

> I agree.

> As it is now, except for AB, it's impossible to find out if the reason that 
> a spam with a currently listed domain got through during recent hours was 
> due to detection problems or just that it's a very recent listing.

> Either having an "Added:" timestamp in the TXT data, or a web page where 
> you can look up an ip and get information on when and why it was added, 
> like many RBLs have, would be a great addition.

> Even a basic recent additions history page like the one AB has at 
> http://spamvertised.abusebutler.com/ would help a lot.

> Thanks,

> Patrik 

It may be of interest that there is a timestamped log of sc
blocklist additions at:

  http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/top-sites-domains.new.log

and a much shorter log of sc whitelist hits at:

  http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/whitelist-hits.new.log

Jeff C.



More information about the Discuss mailing list