[SURBL-Discuss] Fwd: RE: More on SpamCopURI busting tests

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Mon Jul 19 14:24:03 CEST 2004


This is a forwarded message
From: SRH-Lists <giermo at 333tech.com>
To: Jeff Chan <jeffc at surbl.org>
Date: Monday, July 19, 2004, 1:19:36 PM
Subject: More on SpamCopURI busting tests

===8<==============Original message text===============

> Hmm.  I disagree.  For three of the machines, I _know_ there is no
> port 80 blocking.
> 
> > It might be useful if you could show us which tests are failing,
> > but I assume it's the same redirection-handling ones that other
> > people have mentioned.
> 
> Yup.  Same set:
> 
> t/blacklist........ok
> t/dnsrbl...........ok
> t/extract_urls.....ok
> t/mailto...........ok
> t/open_redirect....#     Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 37)
> t/open_redirect....NOK 1#     Failed test (t/open_redirect.t 
> at line 44)
> t/open_redirect....NOK 2#     Failed test (t/open_redirect.t 
> at line 52)
> t/open_redirect....ok 4/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5.
> t/open_redirect....dubious
>         Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
> Scalar found where operator expected at (eval 152) line 1, 
> near "'int'  $__val"
>         (Missing operator before   $__val?)
> DIED. FAILED tests 1-3
>         Failed 3/5 tests, 40.00% okay
> t/spamcopuri.......ok
> t/whitelist........ok

Just adding my "I get the exact same failed tests, no, port 80 is not
blocked and, yes, it seems to work if I force install it"

-steve

===8<===========End of original message text===========



More information about the Discuss mailing list