FW: [SURBL-Discuss] Thanks Jeff, 0.019 works on Rh: GOT IT

Thomas Kinghorn thomask at mtnns.net
Thu Jul 22 11:05:28 CEST 2004

Sorry all.

It would help if I read further down in the page :o$

More SURBL lists
ws.surbl.org - sa-blacklist in SURBL form
In addition to the original SpamCop URI-derived SURBL sc.surbl.org, we are
pleased to have another SURBL compatible with the above plugins, or any
other software that can check message body domains against a name-based RBL.

Sorry for wasting your time



-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Kinghorn 
Sent: 22 July 2004 09:59
To: 'SURBL Discussion list'
Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Thanks Jeff, 0.019 works on Rh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond at prolocation.net]
> Sent: 22 July 2004 09:32
> To: SURBL Discussion list
> Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Thanks Jeff, 0.019 works on Rh
> Hi!
> > bigevil.cf
> Thats one that is doing a lot if think. CPU wise, its included in
> ws.surbl.org, so remove that one...

Do I just add ws in spamcop_uri.cf?

The standard 1 from the installation source is

# vi spamcop_uri.cf 

describe SPAMCOP_URI_RBL      URI's domain appears in spamcop database at
tflags SPAMCOP_URI_RBL  net

score SPAMCOP_URI_RBL  3.0

Sorry for the lame question.



More information about the Discuss mailing list