[SURBL-Discuss] Thanks Jeff, 0.019 works on Rh
Jeff Chan
jeffc at surbl.org
Thu Jul 22 02:10:26 CEST 2004
On Thursday, July 22, 2004, 12:59:25 AM, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
>> From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond at prolocation.net]
>> > bigevil.cf
>>
>> Thats one that is doing a lot if think. CPU wise, its included in
>> ws.surbl.org, so remove that one...
> Do I just add ws in spamcop_uri.cf?
> The standard 1 from the installation source is
> # vi spamcop_uri.cf
> uri SPAMCOP_URI_RBL
> eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('sc.surbl.org','127.0.0.2')
> describe SPAMCOP_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in spamcop database at
> sc.surbl.org
> tflags SPAMCOP_URI_RBL net
> score SPAMCOP_URI_RBL 3.0
If you add a rule and score like:
uri WS_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('ws.surbl.org','127.0.0.2')
describe WS_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in sa-blacklist
tflags WS_URI_RBL net
score WS_URI_RBL 3.0
than that should work.
Jeff C.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list