[SURBL-Discuss] Thanks Jeff, 0.019 works on Rh

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Thu Jul 22 02:10:26 CEST 2004


On Thursday, July 22, 2004, 12:59:25 AM, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
>> From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond at prolocation.net]

>> > bigevil.cf
>> 
>> Thats one that is doing a lot if think. CPU wise, its included in
>> ws.surbl.org, so remove that one...

> Do I just add ws in spamcop_uri.cf?

> The standard 1 from the installation source is

> # vi spamcop_uri.cf 

> uri SPAMCOP_URI_RBL
> eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('sc.surbl.org','127.0.0.2')
> describe SPAMCOP_URI_RBL      URI's domain appears in spamcop database at
> sc.surbl.org
> tflags SPAMCOP_URI_RBL  net

> score SPAMCOP_URI_RBL  3.0

If you add a rule and score like:

uri       WS_URI_RBL  eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('ws.surbl.org','127.0.0.2')
describe  WS_URI_RBL  URI's domain appears in sa-blacklist
tflags    WS_URI_RBL  net

score     WS_URI_RBL  3.0

than that should work.

Jeff C.



More information about the Discuss mailing list