[SURBL-Discuss] Re: Jeff's whitelists

[Frank Ellermann]

Jeff Chan wrote:
 
> I would contend abuse of spamarrest's services, as you
> originally described them, is closer to a Joe Job than
> outright spam by spamarrest.

IBTD.  And if you read some of the 166 messages shown by...

<http://www.google.com/groups?q=spamarrest.com+group%3A*.net-abuse.*+-group%3A*.sightings>

...you'll find that I'm not exactly alone with this opinion.

 [co.to vs. oo.to]
> the site is oo.to, not co.to

Sorry.  <http://oo.cx/domains/home.php> claims that this is a
"iRedirector (subdomain edition)" in it's <title>, and I get
the same page at <http://oo.to/domains/home.php>, dito nn.to,
dito uu.to

I found no abuse report links, but testing some of the domains
mentioned in nanas they _might_ do something about abuse (or
my old browser simply can't handle their weird JavaScripts (?)).  

                            Bye, Frank