[SURBL-Discuss] Re: large number of empty URIs preceeding actual one

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Sat Jun 5 00:11:17 CEST 2004

On Friday, June 4, 2004, 11:03:51 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
>> Interestingly SpamCop did parse the message correctly in
>> terms of ignoring the blank anchors and finding only the
>> clickable ones.

> That's a rather new feature (less than 1 week (?)), and it's
> not yet complete (some "almost empty" links are still handled
> as "spamvertized", see Patrik's comment, but the problem is
> known).
>                        Bye, Frank

Yes indeed, SpamCop's handling of URIs seems to be a work in
progress, as I expect it always will be in order to meet
whatever spammers happen to be doing.

Jeff C.

More information about the Discuss mailing list