[SURBL-Discuss] Re: multi.surbl.org combined list available for
development
Jeff Chan
jeffc at surbl.org
Wed Jun 16 01:06:24 CEST 2004
On Tuesday, June 15, 2004, 5:59:17 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
>> I've set up a bitmasked, combined SURBL list with sc, ws,
>> and ph data: multi.surbl.org
> Tnx, I replace sc.surbl.org by multi.surbl.org in my script.
OK, I should have mentioned that's not the preferred way to do
things. :-) The multi.surbl.org list has lists encoded with
bitmasks that SpamCopURI and urirhsbl won't work too well
with. You *could* make many rules to handle every numeric
combination of the bits, but since this would require 2 ^ N
rules, it shows that the existing single-list programs aren't
really the right tool. What's needed is some different or
added code to decode these back into their original lists.
Justin Mason is adding such code into a new program "urirhsblsub"
now. Hopefully Eric Kolve will be able to roll similar code into
SpamCopURI in future also, or perhaps code up a differently
named program.
> I'm not sure how other combined lists handle this, but how
> about some "combined" test entries:
> Add 127.0.0.4 to ws, 127.0.0.6 to sc + ws,
> 127.0.0.8 to ph, 127.0.0.10 to sc + ph,
> 127.0.0.14 to sc + ws + ph. 127.0.0.12 to ws + ph.
> With these test entries we would get for multi.surbl.org :
> 0.0.0.127.multi => not found
> 1.0.0.127.multi => not found (= no localhost confusion)
> 2.0.0.127.multi => 127.0.0.2 => sc
> 3.0.0.127.multi => not found (same for all odd.0.0.127)
> 4.0.0.127.multi => 127.0.0.4 => sc + ws
> [...]
14.0.0.127.multi =>> 127.0.0.14 => sc + ws + ph
Yes, we could probably make some bitmasked tests. I'll
consider it a task for later.... :-)
Jeff C.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list