[SURBL-Discuss] Another list to test: ab.surbl.org

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Tue Jun 22 16:50:11 CEST 2004


On Sunday, June 20, 2004, 6:23:30 PM, Joseph Burford wrote:

> 19/06/2004      2,439 messages  1,572 marked as spam

> Description                     Total Ham       %       Spam    %
> URL in ws.surbl.org     748     4       0.5     744     99.5
> URL in ob.surbl.org     722     4       0.6     718     99.4
> URL in sc.surbl.org     647     0       0       647     100
> URL in ab.surbl.org     416     14      3.4     402     96.6
> URL in be.surbl.org     48      1       2.1     47      97.9

> 20/06/2004      2,093 messages  1,352 marked as spam

> Description                     Total   Ham     %       Spam    %
> URL in ob.surbl.org     777     31      4       746     96
> URL in ws.surbl.org     731     5       0.7     726     99.3
> URL in sc.surbl.org     528     0       0       528     100
> URL in ab.surbl.org     404     2       0.5     402     99.5
> URL in be.surbl.org     36      0       0       36      100

Thanks much for the data Joseph!

Does anyone else have any results to share, particularly
spam rates and false positives of the beta lists ob.surbl.org and
ab.surbl.org? 

Jeff C.



More information about the Discuss mailing list