[SURBL-Discuss] Please test ob, ob2, ab

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Fri Jun 25 02:04:21 CEST 2004


On Friday, June 25, 2004, 12:16:17 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
> My results, testing ph while I was at it:

> : jm 1351...; grep -v " 0\.500 " freqs
> OVERALL%   SPAM%     HAM%     S/O    RANK   SCORE  NAME
>  121405    22516    98889    0.185   0.00    0.00  (all messages)
> 100.000  18.5462  81.4538    0.185   0.00    0.00  (all messages as %)
>  13.453  70.3766   0.4925    0.993   1.00    1.00  SURBL_WS
>   3.807  20.3811   0.0334    0.998   0.50    1.00  SURBL_SC
>   2.650  14.2565   0.0071    1.000   0.50    1.00  SURBL_AB
>   0.019   0.0933   0.0020    0.979   0.50    1.00  SURBL_PH
>  12.624  67.6275   0.1001    0.999   0.50    1.00  SURBL_OB2
>  13.295  68.5113   0.7230    0.990   0.00    1.00  SURBL_OB

> OB2 looks pretty promising ;)

Thanks much for the data.  Yusuf from Outblaze said to
use the ob2 data source, so I will switch ob over to it
unless there are any results or comments to the contrary.

If anyone else is able to give some test results for
ab, ob and ob2, please speak up.

> The one PH fp is a link to this:

>         http://qrxx.4t.com/barbieOS.htm

> (which no longer works, but 4t.com was a geocities-type hosting site as
> far as I know.)

I have whitelisted 4t.com in SURBLs.

David Hooton,
You may want to check how 4t.com got into the phishing data.

Jeff C.



More information about the Discuss mailing list