[SURBL-Discuss] RE: [SARE] Bigevil IMPORTANT update/test.

Chris Santerre csanterre at merchantsoverseas.com
Fri Jun 25 14:49:05 CEST 2004

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Jezierski [mailto:ajezierski at stepan.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 12:30 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: SURBL Discussion list (E-mail); Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: [SARE] Bigevil IMPORTANT update/test.
>Chris Santerre <csanterre at MerchantsOverseas.com> wrote on 06/25/2004
>11:21:20 AM:
>> I have no idea how this will effect systems under heavy load. Those
>> should definitely stay with SURBL as this is just a local 
>regex copy of
>> But for those systems that can't/won't use SURBL and want a 
>local copy of
>> this larger bigevil here is the link: (~600k)
>Will you be coming up with a MiniEvil that contains just the wildcard
>rules?  Or have all the wildcard sites been added to surbl 

Yes I will be coming out with a wildcard BE. Scored much lower. WS.surbl.org
will not contain those. I'm taking things one step at a time. I'm way behind
in my other SARE projects even now. I can't thnk the other ninjas enough for
picking up my slack. SARE and SURBL have great people involved in those

And of course, no of this would be possible without the great work of the
devs! Who's Kung-fu is mighty!


More information about the Discuss mailing list