[SURBL-Discuss] Re: [SARE] Bigevil IMPORTANT update/test.

Andy Jezierski ajezierski at stepan.com
Fri Jun 25 12:30:15 CEST 2004





Chris Santerre <csanterre at MerchantsOverseas.com> wrote on 06/25/2004
11:21:20 AM:

> I have no idea how this will effect systems under heavy load. Those
systems
> should definitely stay with SURBL as this is just a local regex copy of
it.
> But for those systems that can't/won't use SURBL and want a local copy of
> this larger bigevil here is the link: (~600k)
>

Will you be coming up with a MiniEvil that contains just the wildcard
rules?  Or have all the wildcard sites been added to surbl individually?

Andy



More information about the Discuss mailing list