[SURBL-Discuss] rDNS entries
Mariano Absatz
surbl at lists.com.ar
Mon Jun 28 16:55:21 CEST 2004
El 28 Jun 2004 a las 17:19, Robert Brooks escribió:
> Chris Santerre wrote:
> > That might hurt a lot of virtually hosted and legit sites.
>
> well, if the scoring is appropriate I don't see it's worse than the way smtp
> rbl's are handled.
But, for me, SURBL is much better than plain smtp rbls because its collateral
damage is very, very, very low... regretfully, I can't play the BOFH and I
have to let pass legit e-mail from 'bad' or 'regular' ISPs (most ISPs in
Argentina, including the largest ones would be in these categories, and I
can't reject e-mail from the largest ISPs in the country).
I'm using relatively high scores for SURBL (between 3.0 and 4.0) and couldn't
be doing this with a higher rate of FPs...
See the thread 'Rule for email of "$43321" ?' in SpamAssassin-Users list...
SURBL caught most or all of them because it was highly scored...
>
> It might also encourage the webhosting companies to clamp down on spammers
> hosting content with them.
I'll happily let SPEWS and the other IP RBLs deal with this.
Regards.
--
Mariano Absatz
El Baby
----------------------------------------------------------
Don't worry. I forgot your name, too!
More information about the Discuss
mailing list