[SURBL-Discuss] Spamcop conflict of interest ?
jeffc at surbl.org
Sat May 1 22:36:40 CEST 2004
On Saturday, May 1, 2004, 9:13:10 PM, John Andersen wrote:
> On Saturday 01 May 2004 05:08, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
>> > Hmm....just noticed these comments in a recent slashdot article. Being
>> > slashdot it's hard to know whether to take it seriously or not ;-)
>> > http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=105978&cid=9022567
>> Very very old news, whats your point ?
> Well the article was only yesterday, so how old could it have been?
> As for what his point may be, that should be self evident.
> Here we are building upon SpamCop only to find out there are
> some serious alegations that its in league with the enemy.
> For those of us who are not up on all this "old news"
> why don't you tell us why we should yawn at this...?
I'm not really sure it's relevant. Does it really matter
what software the company that bought SpamCop sells? As
far as I know that doesn't much effect the kind of URI
reports that SpamCop users are making and sc.surbl.org
is therefore using.
I'm interested in any other readings....
More information about the Discuss