[SURBL-Discuss] Spamcop conflict of interest ?
jeffc at surbl.org
Sun May 2 03:53:49 CEST 2004
On Sunday, May 2, 2004, 1:57:43 AM, John Andersen wrote:
> On Saturday 01 May 2004 20:36, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> I'm not really sure it's relevant. Does it really matter
>> what software the company that bought SpamCop sells?
> Yes, of course it does. Your naivete would be refreshing were it
> not so dangerous. I'd love to hear your take on this had they been
> purchased by Scott Richter.
I'm results-oriented. If the parent company somehow impacts
the quality of the *user* reported URIs, then there could be
Otherwise maybe you can clarify how it might be relevant
in terms of actual results as we're using them.
More information about the Discuss