[SURBL-Discuss] Proposal to add some anti-phishing data to SURBL
jeffc at surbl.org
Tue May 4 03:16:07 CEST 2004
On Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 2:03:11 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
>> I think the intention was for our data to be integrated directly into
>> William's prior to arriving at nameservers, however Jeff is more likely to
>> be able to confirm this :)
> That would be perfect, saves the trouble of making a seperate list.
> Would only be nice for example to give a specific code back, so people see
> what the hit triggered... But thats possible, we only need to reserve a
> code in that case.
It's pretty certain we will want to do a combined list of at
least ws and sc. As an alternative to Bill merging a phishing
list into ws, we could add it to a combined list and *not* have
it as a small, separate list. (In other words it would obly
be available in a combined list.) If we do the latter we could
probably give it a unique result value.
Either way is possible (i.e. merge into ws, or merge into a
1. Merge into ws: probably no specific code for phishing
2. Merge into combined list: could have a separate code
2a. (With no separate list for phishing if it's small.)
More information about the Discuss