[SURBL-Discuss] Proposal to add some anti-phishing data to SURBL
maddoc at maddoc.net
Tue May 4 05:39:43 CEST 2004
Jeff Chan <jeffc at surbl.org> wrote ..
> On Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 2:03:11 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> >> I think the intention was for our data to be integrated directly into
> >> William's prior to arriving at nameservers, however Jeff is more likely
> >> be able to confirm this :)
> > That would be perfect, saves the trouble of making a seperate list.
> > Would only be nice for example to give a specific code back, so people
> > what the hit triggered... But thats possible, we only need to reserve
> > code in that case.
> It's pretty certain we will want to do a combined list of at
> least ws and sc. As an alternative to Bill merging a phishing
> list into ws, we could add it to a combined list and *not* have
> it as a small, separate list. (In other words it would obly
> be available in a combined list.) If we do the latter we could
> probably give it a unique result value.
> Either way is possible (i.e. merge into ws, or merge into a
> combined list.):
> 1. Merge into ws: probably no specific code for phishing
> 2. Merge into combined list: could have a separate code
> 2a. (With no separate list for phishing if it's small.)
I vote we make a new one called GonePhising.surbl.org 8*)
I mean with all these Sasser and various M$ worms on the loose only makes send eh?
ps. Of course I wasn't being serious!!!!
More information about the Discuss