[SURBL-Discuss] RE: Bug in Spamcop's surbl add-on module
csanterre at merchantsoverseas.com
Wed May 5 17:03:15 CEST 2004
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc at surbl.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 8:26 AM
>To: spamassassin-users at incubator.apache.org
>Cc: SURBL Discuss
>Subject: Re: Bug in Spamcop's surbl add-on module
>On Wednesday, May 5, 2004, 5:18:04 AM, Keith Hackworth wrote:
>> I was installing
>> a new mail server and testing the surbl lookups, but my test kept
>> getting through not being marked as spam. The test I was using was
>> http://e.1asphost.com - this is on the be.surbl.org list. ...
>> My logs show that the
>> system is looking up 1asphost.com, which is NOT on the list.
> For some
>> reason, it stripped off the "e."
>> It seems that spamcop's surbl doesn't handle subdomains at
>> else seeing this?
>Hmm, it is indeed in BigEvil with the e. :
>and it's therefore making it into be.surbl.org with the e. :
>However we should be taking off the subdomain before it goes into
>the SURBL form. I'll need to check with Chris on how we can
>BTW, SURBL is not a SpamCop project, although we are using
>SpamCop URI domains as a data source in the sc.surbl.org list.
It's not a bug, its a feature! Actually, no its a bug :) I have been going
thru cleaning these sort of things up. However I started at the begining of
the B.E. list. This is at rule 181, I haven't even got to 100 yet! This is
left over from my alpha phase of B.E. I've had a lot more coffee since then.
So I will fix that one, But I'm sure there are others ;)
More information about the Discuss