[SURBL-Discuss] RE: X posting due to importance

Chris Santerre csanterre at merchantsoverseas.com
Wed May 12 16:44:39 CEST 2004

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Matt Linzbach [mailto:MLinzbach at Merchant-Gould.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 2:57 PM
>To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Cc: SURBL Discussion list (E-mail)
>Subject: RE: X posting due to importance
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:csanterre at MerchantsOverseas.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 10:24 AM
>> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>> Cc: SURBL Discussion list (E-mail)
>> Subject: X posting due to importance
>> This was posted to Spam-L list. Very interesting. We should all watch
>> closely. Consider how we would defend our projects if we had to. :-)
>> A Northern California District Court judge issued a temporary 
>> restraining 
>> order to prevent SpamCop, an antispam operation, from 
>> interfering with 
>> messages sent by alleged junk e-mailer OptInRealBig.com.
>> http://news.com.com/2100-1024_3-5210518.html?tag=nefd.top
>/. has an active discussion on this today.

And just like that, it is over :-)


Perhaps I should setup a BigEvil Drinking fund? I mean Legal defense fund.
Yeah thats what I meant!


More information about the Discuss mailing list