[SURBL-Discuss] RFC: Combined SURBL list details, phishing
raymond at prolocation.net
Thu May 13 02:32:28 CEST 2004
> > Its only as a combined list to avoid double lookups for people who check
> > with all 3 available lists, as most do currently. Saves 2/3 of the load on
> > the nameservers :)
> Actually I was getting tricky and proposing to collapse ws and be
> into a single response within a combined list. This was mainly
> to prevent needing to remove separate be entries later since it will
> probably be merged into ws eventually. I was proposing short
> circuiting that process in the combined list.
I would really wanna go for the seprate answers so people know what they
get back as answer. All RBLs do it like that. That way the end user also
has a clear vieuw of whats going on.
If we stop announcing one of the lists we need to work anyway to get
things 'stopped' on end user side.
More information about the Discuss